Main Page       Contact  

Daily Bulletin Subscription

To receive our Daily Bulletin please fill out the form below.

Supplementary Bulletin



An appeal calling for tolerance, contact and cooperation between Turks and Armenians, signed by 53 Nobel laureates of various fields, was issued on April, 9 2007 by The Elie Wiesel Foundation based in New York. The appeal calls for Armenians and Turks to encourage their governments to open the Turkish-Armenian border, generate confidence through civil society cooperation, improve official contacts, allow basic freedoms and to address the gap in perceptions over the “Armenian Genocide”.

On the initiative of The Institute for Armenian Research, a reply to the said appeal was prepared signed by 86 Turkish scholars, writers and retired ambassadors the names of whom are to be found  in the appended list.

The attached reply states, in summary, that the Nobel laureates call was received positively, is viewed as a doorway facilitating a process of dialogue between the two peoples and that fostering relations between civil society organizations constitutes the most appropriate way forward in this regard.

Regarding genocide allegations, the reply states that according to the 1948 UN Convention on Genocide for an event to qualify as genocide a competent court must establish the existence of special intent which has not been established with respect to the Ottoman Armenians and accounts to the contrary should not be seen as anything other than the practice of the freedom of expression.

On the issue of fostering and engaging in dialogue, calling attention to the official proposal Turkey made to Armenia regarding the establishment of a Joint History Commission, the reply stresses how organizations such as the Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity could help foster the mutual exchange of views. 
Source: ERAREN


We, the undersigned Turkish scholars and writers, welcome the call of ‘The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity’ issued on April 9, 2007. We view this call as a doorway to opening a process of dialogue between Turks and Armenians and as a stepping stone which will work to keep that door open facilitating the culture of peace to bear fruit.  We would like to state that we are willing to do our part to make positive contributions to this end.

It can not be refuted that Turks and Armenians have been living closely together under the Turkish Republic, as was the case during the time of the Ottoman Empire, as a result of which they have developed common cultural values. We believe these values may form the basis for the development of future relations.

We are cognizant of the great suffering endured by the Armenians, Turks and other peoples residing within the Ottoman Empire as a result of the tragic events of the First World War, and believe that all responsible individuals alike must actively engage themselves to preclude such suffering from being inflicted upon mankind once again. We are prepared to work constructively to this end. In this regard it should be noted that while acknowledging the loss incurred by a certain population it would be unfair to selectively neglect the irrefutably documented loss of another population residing within the same geography. We maintain that such dogmatic approaches and disregard for differing views lay at the root of the ongoing conflict of our day.

We evaluated the proposals expressed in the call issued by The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity. We are of the opinion that increasing mutual confidence by fostering relations between civil society organizations shall constitute the most constructive way forward.  We believe that the restoration of the Akhdamar Church and the participation of Turkish alongside Armenian officials to its opening was rewarding and hope that such contacts shall increase.

Air travel between Turkey and Armenia is open. The many citizens of the Republic of Armenia residing in Turkey as guest workers carries with it the potential of cultivating close friendship and ties between the citizens of both Republics. The border gate between both countries will surely be opened once those factors which led to it being closed are removed. No doubt, the clear and official affirmation on the part of Armenia to the effect that it recognizes the border between the two countries and does not demand that it be changed shall contribute to the establishment of official diplomatic relations. That part of Turkey’s territories is defined as Western Armenia in the Armenian Declaration of Independence raises concerns regarding Armenia’s possible future irredentist policies.

Turkey does not evaluate the tragic events of 1915 which befell the Ottoman Armenians as genocide as defined in the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide. For an event to legally constitute genocide, a competent court must establish the intent to kill in whole or in part a national, ethnic, racial or religious group solely because they were part of that group (dolus specialis). After evaluating various documents several academics, both Turkish and foreign, have arrived at the conclusion that the requisite genocidal intent was not present with respect to the Ottoman Armenians. We view that differing accounts expressed by a given committee or other groups on this matter should not be seen as anything other than the practice of the freedom of expression. We would like to declare that we are prepared to discuss this issue within the frame of joint committees together with Armenian historians and all those interested; we believe that engaging in dialogue is the only way forward to solve our outstanding problems.  On this point one should not overlook how Turkey officially proposed to Armenia in April 2005, to establish a Joint History Commission comprising Turkish, Armenian and third party specialists for the purpose of conducting historical research on the events prior to and following 1915. To facilitate this proposal Turkey has made it known that all its archives have been opened. We have faith that organizations such as The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity shall help to establish forums where views can be mutually exchanged and welcomed whereby the level of tolerance and cooperation called for can be attained.


1. Prof. Dr. Tahsin AKALP
2. Prof. Dr. Seçil KARAL AKGÜN
3. Prof. Dr. Şahin AKKAYA
4. Rtd. Ambassador Gündüz AKTAN
5. Prof. Dr. Ali AKYILDIZ
6. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gülşen Seyhan ALIŞIK
7. Prof. Dr. Deniz Ülke ARIBOĞAN
8. Assoc. Prof. Dr.Yavuz ASLAN
9. Assoc. Prof. Dr. İbrahim Ethem ATNUR
10. Prof. Dr. Yusuf AVCI
11. Prof. Dr. Süheyl BATUM
12. Prof. Dr. Taner BERKSOY
13. Prof. Dr. Süleyman BEYOĞLU
14. Prof. Dr. Gülay Öğün BEZER
15. Prof. Dr. Ali ATIF BİR 
16. Prof. Dr. Naz ÇAVUŞOĞLU
17. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sadi ÇAYCI
18. Prof. Dr. Mehmet ÇELİK
19. Prof. Dr. Kemal ÇiÇEK
21. Prof. Dr. Sebahat DENİZ
22. Rtd. Ambassador Filiz DİNÇMEN
23. Prof. Dr. Uluğ ELDEGEZ
24. Prof. Dr. Vahdettin ENGİN
25. Prof. Dr. İsmail ERÜNSAL
26. Prof. Dr. Yavuz ERCAN
27. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ETÜCE
28. Prof. Dr. Suat GEZGİN
29. Prof. Dr. Müfit GİRESUNLU
30. Prof. Dr. Ufuk GÜLSOY
31. Prof. Dr. Nurbay GÜLTEKİN
32. Prof. Dr. S. Selçuk GÜNAY
33. Prof. Haluk GÜRGEN
34. Prof. Dr. Erhan GÜZEL
35. Prof. Dr. Yusuf HALLAÇOĞLU
36. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oğuz İÇİMSOY
37. Prof. Dr. Mücteba İLGÜREL
38. Dr. Erdal İLTER
39. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mehmet İNBAŞI
40. Assoc. Prof. Dr.Kamer KASIM
41. Prof. Dr. Fahri KAYAD?B?
42. Prof. Dr. Mustafa KEÇER
43. Prof. Dr. Selami KILIÇ
44. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Murat KOÇ
45. Prof. Dr. Enver KONUKÇU
46. Prof. Dr. Kemalettin KÖROĞLU
47. Prof. Dr. Nuri KÖSTÜKLÜ
48. Prof. Zekeriya KURŞUN
49. Assoc. Prof. Dr.Sedat LAÇİNER
50. Rtd. Ambassador Faruk LOĞOĞLU
51. Rtd. Ambassador Ömer Engin LÜTEM
52. Prof. Dr. Nurşen MAZICI
53. Prof. Dr. Hasan MERİÇ
54. Prof. Dr. Özcan MERT
55. Rtd. Ambassador Tansu OKANDAN
56. Prof. Dr. Besim ÖZCAN
57. Prof. Dr. Hikmet ÖZDEMİR
58. Prof. Dr. Necdet ÖZTÜRK
59. Prof. Dr. Nihat ÖZTOPRAK
60. Prof. Dr. Bayram ÖZTÜRK
61. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bilgehan PAMUK
62. Prof. Dr. Mesut PARLAK
63. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Said POLAT
64. Prof. Dr. Ömer Asım SAÇLI
65. Prof. Dr. Hüseyin SALMAN
66. Prof. Dr. Günay SARIYAR
67. Assoc. Prof. Dr.Sema SOYGENİŞ
68. Assoc. Prof. Dr.Orhan SÖYLEMEZ
69. Rtd. Ambassador Ömer ŞAHİNKAYA
70. Prof. Dr. Hale ŞIVGIN
71. Rtd. Ambassador Bilal N. ŞİMŞİR
72. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ??M??RG?L
73. Rtd. Ambassador Pulat TACAR
74. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Şükrü TEKBAĞ
75. E. Büyükelçi Sanlı TOPÇUOĞLU
76. Prof. Dr. Korkut TUNA
77. Prof. Dr. Muammer UĞUR
78. Prof. Dr. Sema UĞURCAN
79. Prof. Dr. Şafak URAL
80. Rtd. Ambassador Necati UTKAN 
81. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Çetin VARLIK
82. Prof. Dr. Halil YANARDAĞ
83. Prof. Dr. Şenay YALÇIN
84. Prof. Dr. Emine YAZICIOĞLU
85. Prof. Dr. İbrahim YUSUFOĞLU
86. Rtd. Ambassador Erhan YİĞİTBAŞIOĞLU

ERAREN - Institute for Armenian Research

This site is best viewed at 1024 x 768 pixel resolution.